Rx-360 Completes Pilot Audit of Manufacturing Facility: An Industry Case Study from Avantor - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Rx-360 Completes Pilot Audit of Manufacturing Facility: An Industry Case Study from Avantor
Avantor reviews its experience with the Rx-360 shared audit pilot program, which is aimed at protecting the pharmaceutical supply chain. This article is part of a special issue on Outsourcing.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 35, pp. s59-s60

The Avantor audit

Rx–360's Auditor Qualification Working Group selected the third-party, accredited auditors based on a rigorous selection process. Criteria included education and experience with GMP products and training. Two auditors spent two days at Avantor's Phillipsburg manufacturing facility. Four quality department managers from the Avantor site were involved in the audit. In addition, the auditors engaged with additional company experts (e.g., senior validation manager, plant manager, global director of procurement) as needed. The focus of the audit was on the facility's production and shipment of pharmaceutical excipients as well as several highly regulated products: benzyl alcohol; potassium phosphate and potassium nitrate; and hydrochloric acid.

The Phillipsburg plant hosts 40 to 50 audits each year, with each industry audit averaging one day. Using Rx–360's standards, the audit included an evaluation of site security, quality-management procedures, manufacturing operations, packaging and labeling processes, information-technology security, and organization and personnel awareness (2, 3). After receiving an overview of Avantor's quality systems, the auditors toured the Phillipsburg plant. They were shown the complete processes and procedures for the four chemicals noted above, from receiving raw materials through to packaging and shipping final product. The auditors reviewed batch-production records and analytical-testing procedures for packaged material in its final form to ensure for the consistency, quality, and stability on several lots of product. In addition, the auditors reviewed facility documentation to search for any nonconformances. Staff-training records as well as maintenance and calibration records for processes and equipment were also reviewed. Within 30 days of the audit, Rx–360 provided Avantor with a report stating that the company has completed the audit with no critical observations. Rx–360 has since shared the audit with its members.

Lessons learned and the future of Rx–360

Rx–360 expects to audit more facilities as part of its pilot audit program, which will be completed by early 2012. The audit reports and program results will be closely examined by members of the consortium to determine the final qualifications of a standardized procedure for future audits (4). The audit was beneficial because it allowed Avantor to view its manufacturing processes through a lens that combined most industry audit standards into one comprehensive and stringent audit. Avantor is pleased to have completed the audit with no critical findings. Once the pilot is complete, the consortium will focus on amassing a repository of audits for the industry to share, with the goal that manufacturers can replace individual audits with those conducted by Rx–360 (4). In the long run, suppliers and manufacturers will ideally be able to invest more time and resources into advancing security.

Paul Smaltz is executive vice-president for Pharmaceuticals and the Americas at Avantor and an Rx–360 Board Member. Rick Siberski is global director of Quality Assurance and a member of the Rx-360 Auditor Qualification Working Group.

References

1. Rx–360 website, http://www.rx-360.org/, accessed July 8, 2011.

2. Excipact, Draft Excipient GMP Standard, April 2011.

3. IPEC/PQG, GMP Audit Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients (2007).

4. Information according to Rx–360 Chair Lynne Byers.

Read a whitepaper from Avantor on this subject (PDF).


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
20%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
22%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here