A Pharma Manufacturer's View of Quality by Design - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

A Pharma Manufacturer's View of Quality by Design
Pfizer's Experience with QbD. This article is part of a special issue on Outsourcing.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 35, pp. s34-s39

Benefits of QbD

Strongly focused on collaboration between research and manufacturing, QbD advances process understanding for increased effectiveness and efficiency. The "real time, real data" sharing of industry knowledge optimizes front-end design to more fully support the product life cycle. The science- and risk-based approach boosts regulator confidence by minimizing regulator risk. Because QbD brings medicines to patients in a better-understood and fundamentally more reliable way, consumers benefit as well.

QbD reduces postapproval regulatory submissions, minimizes risk around manufacturing failures and product recalls, trims non-value-added regulatory and compliance activities, and facilitates novel approaches to process validation. At the same time, QbD improves regulatory flexibility, process understanding, and application of technology. QbD hones regulatory-review criteria, capitalizes on experience to leverages industrywide expertise, and fosters global harmonization that will benefit the global pharmaceutical industry, its consumers, and other stakeholders.

QbD concepts coincide with a burgeoning global industry movement toward building quality into pharmaceuticals from development through manufacturing by bridging gaps between pharmaceutical development and manufacturing and using sound science to demonstrate and assure the product's safety, quality, and efficacy throughout its entire life cycle. Launched in 2007, the Product Quality Lifecycle Implementation (PQLI) initiative is a global, industry-led effort led by International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering to facilitate the implementation of ICH standards.

Pfizer is actively engaged in the PQLI initiatives. In collaboration with the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, the European Medicines Agency conducted a regulator/industry event around ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10. Pfizer played a key role in facilitating this collaborative initiative. Activities included mock regulatory inspections that were conducted at Pfizer sites and seminars on topics that included product life-cycle management, forward-thinking action steps, and criticality.

Conclusion

The examples cited in this article are just some ways of how QbD is affecting the pharmaceutical industry and its regulatory agencies on a global scale. To facilitate continuous improvement and technical innovation, the global pharmaceutical industry needs a global quality and regulatory framework for postapproval changes. Trying to develop increasingly complicated technologies with fewer resources than were available in the past is an ongoing challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. By enabling pharmaceutical companies to focus on critical and promising products and process areas, QbD and other global harmonization efforts will help the industry meet such challenges. The QbD initiatives in place throughout Pfizer are fostering the vital codevelopment, collaboration, and innovation that position the company to meet 21st century global industry challenges. In harmony with Pfizer's Right First Time and other continuous improvement programs and initiatives, QbD will support Pfizer's global transformation and drive its forward growth.

Vince McCurdy is head of the Right First Time Program Office at Pfizer Global Research & Development, Gerry Migliaccio is senior vice-president of Network Performance for Pfizer Global Supply, Roger Nosal is vice-president of Pfizer Global Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls in Pfizer Pharmaceutical Sciences, and James Spavins is vice-president of Global Chemistry, Manufacturing,and Controls & Global Supply Chain in Pfizer Pharmaceutical Sciences.

References

1. FDA, "Submission of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information in a New Drug Application Under the New Pharmaceutical Quality of Assessment System; Notice of Pilot Program," Fed. Reg. 70 (134), 407619–40720 (July 2005).

2. ICH, Q8 Pharmaceutical Development (2008)

3. ICH, Q9 Quality Risk Management (2005).

4. ICH, Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (2008).

Note: For related article, see "Global Regulatory Submissions for QbD: Wyeth's Experience in the CMC Pilot," in the October 2009 issue of Pharmaceutical Technology.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
32%
Breakthrough designations
11%
Protecting the supply chain
37%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
11%
More stakeholder involvement
11%
View Results
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim Miller Health Systems Raise the Bar on Reimbursing New Drugs
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerThe Mainstreaming of Continuous Flow API Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Industry Seeks Clearer Standards for Track and Trace
Siegfried Schmitt Ask the Expert Siegfried SchmittData Integrity
Sandoz Wins Biosimilar Filing Race
NIH Translational Research Partnership Yields Promising Therapy
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here