Inside USP: International Dialogue on Biologics Standards - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Inside USP: International Dialogue on Biologics Standards
USP promotes horizontal standards for biologics' quality attributes.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 35, Issue 8, pp. 76-77


Tina Morris
In a study released in May 2011, US regulatory approvals for biologic drugs and biotechnology products (collectively referred to as "biologics") were reported to have nearly doubled in the past decade, compared to the 1990s. This growing market emphasizes the need for consistent approaches to product quality and public standards. In its upcoming Science & Standards Symposium on Biologics & Biotechnology, "Advancing Quality Standards through Analytics and Assays," taking place October 3-6 in Seattle, the US Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) will lead discussions on standards-setting initiatives related to biologics and the materials critical for their manufacture as a growing number of these types of drugs enter the therapeutic space.

Setting the stage for the symposium are keynote speakers Steve Kozlowski, director of the FDA Office of Biotechnology Products, and Gillian Woollett, chief scientist at the Washington, DC, law firm Engel & Novitt. Each will discuss the regulation of biologics. The following two-and-a-half days of technical sessions will include presentations from an international panel of industrial, academic, and regulatory stakeholders engaged in the development of quality standards for biologics. USP topic experts will discuss general analytical approaches and what they can do for biologics; quality attributes of biologic drugs by product class; and the US regulatory landscape for these products. An entire track of sessions will focus on bioassays and the assessment of biological potency, critical to all biological medicines.

Quality standards set by the USP—and enforceable by FDA—have traditionally been developed using what's called a "vertical approach," which is particularly suited for the characterization of small-molecule drugs. Under this approach, documentary standards (or product monographs) have been created for one drug product at a time, with associated reference materials (i.e., pure physical samples used as reference chemicals for testing) developed in tandem with monographs. General chapters in USP's official compendium, US Pharmacopeia-National Formulary (USP-NF), represent overarching information and testing procedures that apply across all or groups of monographs. These chapters broadly support product-specific (vertical) standards in the determination of identity, strength, and purity.

Compared with their small-molecule counterparts, biologics are heterogeneous and more complex in their makeup. Thus, analysis and characterization are more challenging and require an even greater portfolio of good analytical procedures that can underpin product characterization.

Another important issue for biologics quality is the use of ancillary and process materials that are also complex biologics. Common examples are fetal bovine serum (FBS) widely used in vaccine manufacturing; cytokines like interleukin-4 (IL-4) used in the cell-therapy arena; and materials like protein A, used in monoclonal-antibody manufacturing. The quality of these materials going into the manufacturing process can have a direct impact on the quality of the medicinal product itself, especially when the end product is not highly purified and residual amounts of the ancillary material have to remain.

Working through expert committees and advisory expert panels, the USP biologics and biotechnology department has been actively revising and developing new chapters in USP-NF. Work has focused on general guidance in the form of information chapters, and also on specific test and product-class chapters that speak to the analysis of quality attributes for certain biologics product classes and the analytical procedures necessary to measure them. The goal with these "horizontal" standards is to provide more broadly applicable quality expectations in areas where analytical platform approaches already exist.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
70%
Breakthrough designations
4%
Protecting the supply chain
17%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
2%
More stakeholder involvement
7%
View Results
Eric Langerr Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerRelationship-building at Top of Mind for Clients
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerRisk Reduction Top Driver for Biopharmaceutical Raw Material Development
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Changes and Challenges for Generic Drugs
Faiz Kermaini Industry Insider Faiz KermainiNo Signs of a Slowdown in Mergers
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Ebola Outbreak Raises Ethical Issues
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 2: Realizing the Benefits of Unified Communications
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 1: Challenges and Changes
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here