FDA Perspectives: Scientific Considerations of Forced Degradation Studies in ANDA Submissions - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

FDA Perspectives: Scientific Considerations of Forced Degradation Studies in ANDA Submissions
The author outlines the scientific aspects of forced degradation studies that should be considered in relation to ANDA submissions.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 36, Issue 5, pp. 73-80

Conclusion

An appropriately-designed stress study meshes well with the QbD approaches currently being promoted in the pharmaceutical industry. A well-designed stress study can provide insight in choosing the appropriate formulation for a proposed product prior to intensive formulation development studies. A thorough knowledge of degradation, including mechanistic understanding of potential degradation pathways, is the basis of a QbD approach for analytical method development and is crucial in setting acceptance criteria for shelf-life monitoring. Stress testing can provide useful insight into the selection of physical form, stereo-chemical stability of a drug substance, packaging, and storage conditions. It is important to perform stress testing for generic drugs due to allowable qualitative and quantitative differences in formulation with respect to the RLD, selection of manufacturing process, processing parameters, and packaging materials.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Bob Iser, Naiqi Ya, Dave Skanchy, Bing Wu, and Ashley Jung for their scientific input and support.

Ragine Maheswaran, PhD, is a CMC reviewer at the Office of Generic Drugs within the Office of Pharmaceutical Science, under the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Disclaimer: The views and opinions in this article are only those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Food and Drug Administration.

References

1. ICH, Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products (Geneva, Feb. 2003).

2. ICH, Q1B Stability Testing: Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products (Geneva, Nov. 1996).

3. H. Brittain, Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances and Excipients (Academic Press, London, 2002).

4. A. Srinivasan and R. Iser, Pharm. Technol. 34 (1), 5059 (2010).

5. A. Srinivasan, R. Iser, and D. Gill, Pharm. Technol. 34(8), 4551 (2010).

6. A. Srinivasan, R. Iser, and D. Gill, Pharm. Technol. 35 (2), 5867 (2011).

7. S. Klick, et al., Pharm.Technol. 29 (2) 4866 (2005).

8. K. M. Alsante, L. Martin and S. W. Baertschi, Pharm.Technol. 27 (2) 60-72 (2003).

9. D. W. Reynolds, et al., Pharm.Technol. 26 (2), 4856 (2002).

10. K. M. Alsante et al., Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 59, 2937 (2007).

11. FDA, Guidance for Industry on Analytical Procedures and methods Validation Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Documentation (draft) (Rockville, MD, Aug. 2000).

12. ICH, Q6A: Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances (Geneva, Oct. 1999).

13. ICH, Q3A(R2) Impurities in New Drug Substances (Geneva, Oct. 2006).

14. ICH, Q3B(R2) Impurities in New Drug Products (Geneva, June 2006).

15. FDA, Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Impurities in Drug Substances (draft), (Rockville, MD, Aug. 2005).

16. FDA, Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Impurities in Drug Products (draft) (Rockville, MD, Nov. 2010).

17. EMA, Guideline on the Limits of Genotoxic Impurities, Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP) (Doc. Ref EMA/CHMP/QWP/251344/2006) (Jan. 1, 2007).

18. K. A. Conners et al., Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals, Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 2nd Ed., p. 19 (1986).


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
26%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
13%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
10%
All of the above.
41%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
10%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here