Mean Kinetic Relative Humidity: A New Concept for Assessing the Impact of Variable Relative Humidity on Pharmaceuticals - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

 Pharmaceutical Technology All results
Mean Kinetic Relative Humidity: A New Concept for Assessing the Impact of Variable Relative Humidity on Pharmaceuticals
This article introduces the concept of "mean kinetic relative humidity" (MKRH) for evaluating the impact of humidity variability on the stability of solid-state pharmaceuticals analogously to the way mean kinetic temperature (MKT) is used for assessing the impact of temperature variability.
 Nov 2, 2012 Pharmaceutical Technology Volume 36, Issue 11, pp. 52-57

Methods

Because the MKRH is analogous in concept to the MKT, it is helpful to provide a brief review of the MKT. The definition of MKT provided above describes how the MKT concept is an attempt to provide a single temperature which, if the product were stored at this constant temperature, would age the product to an equal degree to that obtained from storing the product at a variable temperature over the same period of time. The MKT is derived directly from the Arrhenius equation that relates reaction rate with temperature (Equation 1):

where k = the rate constant of the degradation reaction, A = the 'pre-exponential factor', Ea = activation energy (KJ·mol-1), R = universal gas constant = 8.314 J·K-1·mol-1, and T = temperature (K).

The MKT can be calculated as shown in Equation 2:

where MKT = mean kinetic temperature (K), T 1 to T n = the variable temperature (K) measured at constant intervals, and n = the number of temperature measurements.

In the solid state, the rate of the degradation reaction has been shown to vary with temperature and relative humidity according to the humidity-corrected Arrhenius equation in Equation 3 (8–12):

where B = the moisture-sensitivity term and RH = relative humidity (%).

It can be seen from the humidity-corrected Arrhenius equation that reaction rates increase exponentially with RH; the additional B term is the magnitude of the effect of RH on the rate of degradation. The B term varies from product to product (as does Ea) and can be typically determined from a short (e.g., 2 week) accelerated stability study as described by Waterman et al. (9–12). The B term is most simply expressed as the logarithm of the ratio of the degradation rates obtained at two different relative humidity conditions (at the same temperature) divided by the difference in relative humidity as shown in Equation 4:

where k1 is the rate constant of reaction at relative humidity RH1, and k2 is the rate constant of reaction at relative humidity RH2 at the same temperature.

The B term is typically in the range of 0 to 0.09. A B term of 0 indicates that RH has no effect on reaction rate, whereas a B term of 0.09 indicates a high dependency on RH: the degradation rate would double for every 8% increase in RH.

On the basis of the humidity-corrected Arrhenius equation, the isothermal MKRH can be calculated as shown in Equation 5:

where MKRHisothermal = mean kinetic relative humidity (%), RH 1 to RH n = the variable relative humidity (%) measured at constant intervals, and n = the number of relative humidity measurements.

A complication that arises as a consequence of the humidity-corrected Arrhenius equation is that the established MKT equation holds true only for samples held at constant relative humidity, and Equation 5 for MKRH holds true for samples held at constant temperature.

| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly
 Survey
What do you think the role of continuous (rather than batch) processes in pharmaceutical manufacturing will be over the next five years?
Many companies in the industry will be using continuous processes for some products.
Companies in both pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical production will be evaluating continuous processes but few will implement.
Only a few companies will be evaluating or implementing; most will stay with batch processing.
Many companies in the industry will be using continuous processes for some products. 34%
Companies in both pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical production will be evaluating continuous processes but few will implement. 29%
Only a few companies will be evaluating or implementing; most will stay with batch processing. 38%
Most Viewed Articles
 Columnists Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerNovel Expression Systems Opening CMO Opportunities sponsored by Ingredients Insider Cynthia Challener, PhDSecuring the Global API Supply Chain Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler FDA Focuses on Drug Appearance and Attributes European Regulatory WatcchSean MilmoEMA Collaborates with HTA Assessment Networks
 UPCOMING CONFERENCES Serialization Summit San Diego, CA Feb. 27-28, 2014 Advances in Aseptic Processing San Diego, CA Mar. 10-12, 2014 ClinTech 2014 Cambridge, MA Mar. 11-13 2014 Investigator-Initiated and Sponsored Research (IISR) Philadelphia, PA Mar. 19-20 2014 See All Conferences >>
 VALIDATION RESOURCES FROM IVT NETWORK Process Validation Special Editions 19th Annual Validation Week Compendium Computer and Software Validation Volume II Special Edition Analytical Method Validation Toolkit More from IVT