Choosing the right CDMO is a strategic decision that can significantly impact the success of biologics development. By evaluating a CDMO’s ability to adapt programs to specific protein therapies and manufacturing needs, leverage specialized expertise, offer integrated solutions and overcome industry challenges, manufacturers can make informed decisions that maximize their chances of project success. In this article, Bora Biologics explores how a strategic approach — adapting programs for specific proteins and customer needs — can be beneficial in achieving the customer’s biologics development goals for novel therapeutics or biosimilars.
The FDA expanded Anktiva to BCG-unresponsive papillary-only NMIBC using existing CIS trial data, a precedent with implications for development timelines and supply planning.
Ishani Maharaj of Ingredients + Specialties from Univar Solutions explains how to stabilize GLP-1 multi-agonists, weigh delivery formats, and qualify novel excipients and suppliers.
MASH and cardiomyopathy AI collaboration: AstraZeneca pays insitro $40M upfront for target discovery, then leads clinical development and CMC planning.
Boyang Wang, Immortal Dragons, discusses how the FDA’s Expedited IND Pilot must prove efficiency as sponsors chase the fastest route to valid first-in-human data.
Nate Edwards of Arya Consulting moderates a discussion with Elisabeth Gardiner of Tevard Biosciences and Donny Xu of the RTW Institute about rare disease treatment development and navigating the FDA’s Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher Program.
The FDA’s Rare Disease Framework Initiative brings risk-based CMC review and pre-approval inspections into scope for sponsors, CDMOs, and quality teams.