News|Articles|September 11, 2020

Career FDA Leaders Say Science Is Agency’s Guide

In an opinion article, FDA leaders commit to applying “the best science” to approval decisions.

Following the release of public statements from representatives of the biotech industry and top executives at bio/pharma companies pressing for adherence to science-based decisions in the development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines, FDA leaders, in a Sept. 11, 2020 opinion column, argued that the agency is committed to such principles, while acknowledging it operates in a political environment.

In the column published on www.USAToday.com, nine senior FDA leaders noted that while the pandemic has presented challenges for the agency, exposing it to controversy and public scrutiny, “protecting the public health is our beacon, and sound science is our guide to navigate controversial waters.”

The agency makes decisions on the safety and effectiveness of medical products based on available science, the authors explained in the statement, and criticism from stakeholders is expected. FDA works best when its experts are “free to do what they do best—follow the science to address public health issues and revise policy if the understanding of science changes,” the authors wrote.

“If the agency’s credibility is lost because of real or perceived interference, people will not rely on the agency’s safety warnings. Erosion of public trust will leave consumers and patients doubting our recommendations, less likely to enroll in clinical studies or to use FDA-regulation products when they should to maintain or improve their health,” the statement read. “We will work with agency leadership to maintain FDA’s steadfast commitment to ensure our decisions will continue to be guided by the best science.”

In a poll conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation, more than half of those surveyed said they would not get a free COVID-19 vaccine if one were approved by FDA before the presidential election.

The statement was signed by nine self-described “senior career civil servants” including Janet Woodcock, director at FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Peter Marks, director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; Steven Solomon, director of FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine; and Patrizia Cavazzoni, deputy director for CDER.

Sources:

USA Today​

Kaiser Family Foundation​


Related to this article

PharmTech Weekly Roundup—October 2, 2026
This week on PharmTech, Merck diversified its pipeline, USP emphasizes supply chain security, AI systems are examined, and speakers preview their presentations at CPHI Milan and AAPS PharmSci 360.
CPHI Milan 2026: Nitrosamine Risk Mitigation, Part 1
Capsugel's Bram Baert and Sandrine Picco argue that chasing zero nitrite in pharmaceutical excipients is often impractical and costly. They recommend setting scientifically justified, risk-based limits and consistently staying below them.
Regulatory Roundup—September 2026
The FDA opened an expedited IND pilot, tightened scrutiny of foreign trial data, and finalized a rule recognizing non-animal testing methods. In Europe, the EMA advanced pharmaceutical legislation reform, restricted 2 legacy products, and opened an injectable-iron safety review.
Pharma Logistician Using IoT Based On Blockchain | Image Credit: ©leowolfert -stock.adobe.com
Michael Levy, senior vice president, Digital & Innovation, USP, explains the digital supply chain in a preview of his upcoming CPHI Milan panel presentation, The Next Phase of Pharma Supply Chains.