OR WAIT 15 SECS
Tim Freeman is Managing Director of powder characterization company Freeman Technology for whom he has worked since the late 1990s. He was instrumental in the original design and continuing development of the FT4 Powder RheometerÂ® and through his work with various professional bodies, and involvement in industry initiatives, is an established contributor to wider developments in powder processing.Tim has a degree in Mechatronics from the University of Sussex in the UK. He is a mentor on a number of project groups for the Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic Particulate Systems in the US and a frequent contributor to industry conferences in the area of powder characterisation and processing. A past Chair of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Process Analytical Technology Focus Group Tim is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Pharmaceutical Technology and features on the Industry Expert Panel in European Pharmaceutical Review magazine. Tim is also a committee member of the Particle Technology Special Interest Group at the Institute of Chemical Engineers, Vice-Chair of the D18.24 sub-committee on the Characterization and Handling of Powders and Bulk Solids at ASTM and a member of the United States Pharmacopeial (USP) General Chapters Physical Analysis Expert Committee (GC-PA EC).
Efforts to tackle challenges in tablet manufacture are shaped by quality by design (QbD) and continuous manufacturing.
Experts take a look at the journey travelled thus far and where pharmaceutical manufacturing is heading over the next decade.
Current efforts to tackle the ongoing challenges in tablet manufacture are shaped by two features of the industrial landscape: quality by design (QbD) and continuous manufacturing. The quality of finished tablets is defined by critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as assay, weight, hardness and disintegration. However, ensuring these CQAs is made difficult by the number of steps involved in tablet production. Identifying analytical technologies that can be used to connect CQAs with the critical processing parameters (CPPs) for each individual step is a shared objective for the successful implementation of both QbD and continuous tablet manufacture.
Figure 1summarises the operations involved in continuous tablet manufacture, each of which has the potential to impact the CQAs of the tablet. This multi-step nature of tablet production means that there are many CPPs to assess and many process variables that directly affect the quality of the finished tablet. Indeed, estimates suggest the number of CPPs for a typical tableting process may be in excess of 100 (1).
Pharmaceutical Technology Europe25th Anniversary Issue
Successful implementation of QbD in this environment relies on being able to measure properties of the in-process material at the exit of, for example, a granulator, which directly correlate with the CQAs of the tablet. Doing so enables the discrete development of each individual step, to build an efficient process, whether batch or continuous. Relevant process analytical technology (PAT) is crucial if this objective is to be achieved.
This PAT toolbox is likely to include techniques such as near infrared and particle sizing, but there is also additional value in measuring certain bulk properties of tableting blends and granules. Especially crucial is flowability, which as recent research has revealed, shows a direct correlation between the basic flowability energy of the granules exiting a wet granulation step and the hardness of tablets produced from them (2). Results such as these demonstrate the need to embrace a range of analytical techniques, whether in-line or at-line, to efficiently investigate and optimise each step of the tableting process. Selecting the most relevant analytical tools for tableting is paramount if the objectives of QbD are to be realised to their full potential.
1. Inna Ben-Anat, “QbD implementation in Generic Industry: Overview and Case Study,” presentation at IFPAC (Baltimore, Maryland, Jan. 2013).
2. J. Clayton and J. Yin, Pharm Technol 38 (6) 44-49 (2014).
About the Author
Tim Freeman, Freeman Technology