News|Articles|November 4, 2015

Warning Letter Cites AFP for GMP Violations

FDA noted multiple manufacturing, testing, and labeling violations at American Family Pharmacy’s Indianapolis facility.

FDA has issued a warning letter to American Family Pharmacy (AFP), Indianapolis, IN, for violations of good manufacturing practices observed during a June 22–July 8, 2014 inspection.

The violations included failure to fulfil its registration and listing obligations, failure of a delayed release product (Aspirin Enteric Safety Coated Tablets) to meet compendial specifications for assay, content uniformity, and dissolution.

FDA noted that the company assigned all 81 mg aspirin tablets manufactured over five months to a single lot number, negating the ability to distinguish between lots. The lot was released without quality testing for identity, strength, quality, and purity of the drug product. A similar practice was followed for lots of 500 mg acetaminophen.

In addition, the company failed to establish and follow procedures for receiving, handling, or testing components and drug product containers and closures; failed to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control to assure that manufactured drug products have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they are represented to possess; failed to assure that the expiration dates for the drug products are determined by appropriate stability testing; and failed to establish and follow written procedures to assure correct labeling of drug products.

In branding violations, the immediate container label for aspirin enteric safety coated tablets did not include warnings for Reye’s Syndrome or stomach bleeding. Three products were not listed with FDA.

The company informed FDA that it had ceased operations in May 2014.

In the warning letter, FDA noted that the agency “strongly recommends that if you decide to resume production, you undertake a comprehensive assessment of your operations before you restart manufacturing and distributing any drug products. We also strongly recommend that this comprehensive evaluation is conducted by a qualified third party consultant with relevant manufacturing expertise. “

Source: FDA

 

 

 

 


Related to this article

Glass vial, pipette and woman scientist in laboratory for medical study, research or experiment. Test tube, dropper and professional female person with chemical liquid for pharmaceutical innovation. | Image Credit: ©HockleyMedia24/peopleimages.com -stock.adobe.com
Equivalence test using two one-sided tests are widely used for demonstrating the comparability of treatment effects in different research fields. The method described in the manuscript aims to use simulations in Microsoft Excel to compute power for 2 one-sided tests for two groups with unequal variances.
Complying with International Pharmacopoeias
Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow with Nelson Labs, and Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical, with Parexel, clear up some of the confusion about what does and does not need to be complied with regarding standards set by international pharmacopoeias.
CPHI Milan 2026: Nitrosamine Risk Mitigation, Part 2
Mitigating nitrosamine risk requires assessing each product individually, says Bram Baert, Global Head of Regulatory Affairs at Capsugel, and Sandrine Picco, Senior Analytical Specialist on Capsugel's Innovaform Accelerator Team, in this interview with PharmTech.
PharmTech Weekly Roundup—October 2, 2026
This week on PharmTech, Merck diversified its pipeline, USP emphasizes supply chain security, AI systems are examined, and speakers preview their presentations at CPHI Milan and AAPS PharmSci 360.