News|Articles|August 17, 2016

FDA CItes Measurement, Validation Deficiencies in its Warning Letter to Noven

Flawed testing and analysis and a failure to analyze the root cause of customer complaints were among the top problems noted in FDA's letter to the Florida-based transdermal drug manufacturer.

FDA has issued a Warning Letter to Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pointing to a number of problems with measurement, analysis and testing, as well as insufficient attention to customer complaints and their root causes.  Inspectors took exception to one particular measurement method used to measure movement of adhesive past the edges or through the slit in a release liner, calling it “unsound,” and noting that movement of adhesive can lead to product detachment and expose the drug to other people.

Customer complaints for one product increased by 50% from 2013 to 2014, inspectors noted, but Noven had failed to determine the root causes of problems.  Inspectors trace that to inadequate testing methods.  In one case, subjective visual interpretation was used to determine whether adhesive residue remained on a pouch or around product edges.  Another test required excessive sample handling, which, inspectors said, could result in inaccuracy. The company had told FDA inspectors previously that it would assess testing methods, yet continued to use those same methods for release testing.

Noven’s staff members had also failed to validate test methods to detect adhesive transfer, FDA said, which would remove the drug from the product, rendering it unusable. 

Inspectors also found that analysts failed to follow the firm’s testing procedures.  In one case, the analyst did not record failed tests.  In another, the analyst did not calibrate the testing machine.  The company had also failed to investigate discrepancies of batch failures.

Noven was also cited for failing to maintain written records so that data could be used to evaluate quality standards, and for failure to follow written procedures for handling all written and oral complaints, a problem that FDA had noted at the facility in February, 2009.

 

 

 


Related to this article

Glass vial, pipette and woman scientist in laboratory for medical study, research or experiment. Test tube, dropper and professional female person with chemical liquid for pharmaceutical innovation. | Image Credit: ©HockleyMedia24/peopleimages.com -stock.adobe.com
Equivalence test using two one-sided tests are widely used for demonstrating the comparability of treatment effects in different research fields. The method described in the manuscript aims to use simulations in Microsoft Excel to compute power for 2 one-sided tests for two groups with unequal variances.
Complying with International Pharmacopoeias
Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow with Nelson Labs, and Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical, with Parexel, clear up some of the confusion about what does and does not need to be complied with regarding standards set by international pharmacopoeias.
CPHI Milan 2026: Nitrosamine Risk Mitigation, Part 2
Mitigating nitrosamine risk requires assessing each product individually, says Bram Baert, Global Head of Regulatory Affairs at Capsugel, and Sandrine Picco, Senior Analytical Specialist on Capsugel's Innovaform Accelerator Team, in this interview with PharmTech.
PharmTech Weekly Roundup—October 2, 2026
This week on PharmTech, Merck diversified its pipeline, USP emphasizes supply chain security, AI systems are examined, and speakers preview their presentations at CPHI Milan and AAPS PharmSci 360.