Editor’s Note: This article was published in Pharmaceutical Technology Europe’s December 2021 print issue.
- Pharmaceutical Technology, December 2021 Issue
- Volume 45
- Issue 12
Spinning Success? The Benefits of University Spinouts
Pharma and biotech are ruling the roost in terms of university innovation, but European spinouts are still experiencing barriers to long-term success.
University spinouts enable the commercialization of innovative research from academic institutions, providing early-stage project visibility for Big Pharma companies and investors, creation of intellectual property, and technology transfer services. The benefits of university spinouts, such as BioNTech for example, have been irrefutably proven over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Intellectual property services and R&D tax credit specialists, GovGrant, performed analysis of data for companies founded in the past 20 years. Their analysis revealed that, in the United Kingdom, university spinouts in the fields of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology managed to raise the most capital (1). In fact, half of all the capital raised, which is worth £5.9 billion, went to pharmaceutical and biotech spinout companies.
Additionally, based on its analysis, GovGrant found that seven of the top 10 most successful university spinouts from the past decade are housed within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The top‑ranking spinout, Exscientia from the University of Dundee, is valued at £784.5 million (1).
However, despite the publicised success stories, there are still hurdles for European university spinouts to overcome. A potentially success-limiting issue for university spinouts is the continuing lack of sufficient late-stage funding (2). Even with growth in late-stage funds since 2010 and higher returns on investment in Europe, the region still lags behind the United States and China in the biotech sector (3). Then there is the challenge with equity shares and revenue royalties that have been specified as ‘too high’ in Europe, which is not necessarily the case for US academic entrepreneurs (4).
So, how might Europe as a whole begin to take advantage of the innovation borne from academic institutions in the longer term? Domestic funding, particularly during the late stages would be a good start (5).
References
1. GovGrant,
2. C. Lang, “Biotech Investments in Germany ‘Could Prove to be a Treasure Trove’,” Pinsent Masons, Analysis Article, 5 May 2021.
3. McKinsey & Company, “Infographic: Capital Landscape for European Biotechs is Maturing, but it Continues to Trail the United States,” Article, 12 Aug. 2021.
4. N. Benaich, “Universities in the UK and Europe Have a Start-Up Problem,” Financial Times, Article, 10 May 2021.
5. M. Palmer, “Should the New UK £375m ‘Breakthrough’ Fund Back Startups or Scaleups?” Sifted, 23 July 2021.
About the Author
Felicity Thomas is the European editor for Pharmaceutical Technology Group.
Article Details
Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Vol. 33, No. 12
December 2021
Page: 6
Citation
When referring to this article, please cite it as F. Thomas, “Spinning Success?” Pharmaceutical Technology Europe 33 (12) 2021.
Articles in this issue
almost 4 years ago
Digitalization Moves Forward in Pharma Equipment and Processesalmost 4 years ago
Digital Transformation Project Reduces Downtimealmost 4 years ago
Using Tolerance Intervals to Assess Conformance to Requirementsalmost 4 years ago
It’s a Matter of Taste-Maskingalmost 4 years ago
Stabilization of Amorphous APIsalmost 4 years ago
Trends in Isolator Equipmentalmost 4 years ago
Analytics Advances for Optimizing Downstream Processesalmost 4 years ago
Looking Past the Pandemic: The Future of GMPs in Aseptic Processingalmost 4 years ago
Not a Particle of Doubtalmost 4 years ago
Accelerating Project Delivery with a Lean Alternative to DBBNewsletter
Get the essential updates shaping the future of pharma manufacturing and compliance—subscribe today to Pharmaceutical Technology and never miss a breakthrough.






