Considering 3D Printing for Solid Dosage Forms

September 19, 2018
Jennifer Markarian

Jennifer Markarian is manufacturing editor of Pharmaceutical Technology.

Equipment and Processing Report

Equipment and Processing Report, Equipment and Processing Report-09-19-2018, Volume 11, Issue 10

3D printing is being explored as a manufacturing method for on-demand, personalized medicine.

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is also known as additive manufacturing because these technologies create a part by adding material layer by layer, guided by a 3D computer model. Various types of 3DP are being used in manufacturing in industries ranging from aerospace to medical devices, and some of the 3DP technologies are being explored for use in manufacturing of oral-solid dosage (OSD) drugs and drug-device combination products. 

Pharmaceutical Technology spoke with Abdul Basit, professor of Pharmaceutics at the University College London (UCL) School of Pharmacy, and Alvaro Goyanes, director of Development at FabRx, which was started up in 2014 by researchers from UCL, about their 3D-printed tablets they call printlets and the different methods of 3DP that can be employed to manufacture OSD drugs. Basit is also one of the editors for a recently published book, 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals (1). 

Advantages of 3DP

PharmTech:What are the advantages of 3DP for drug manufacturing?

Basit (UCL) and Goyanes (FabRx):The possibility of easily creating 3D printed tablets (printlets) or medical devices just by modifying a digital file offers many opportunities. For example, by changing the object size or the infill (i.e., percentage of material inside the object), the mass of the printlet, and hence the dose of the medicine, can be flexibly altered. Conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing processes are inherently laborious, resource intensive, and dose inflexible. Indeed, there are limited commercially available dosages for certain medications, often requiring patients to split or crush their tablets to get the right dose. Instead, 3DP can enable the efficient design and preparation of small batches of medicines, comprising an individualized dose, shape, and size for each patient. In turn, this technology could reduce the risk of medication errors and side effects, while improving treatment efficacy and adherence. Due to the compact and user-friendly nature of the 3D printers, it could be possible to integrate this technology into a hospital or community pharmacy setting, enabling on-demand medicine production on the front-line. This technology is likely to be transformative in pediatric medicine, in which the dose of medicines can change rapidly, depending on the age or weight of the child. Furthermore, it is possible to combine two or more drugs into the same printlet, reducing the number of tablets that one person has to swallow, which is especially important in geriatric populations. Therefore, our aim at FabRx is to optimize the 3DP technology to enable the production of personalized medicines for each individual patient.

We are confident that 3DP will cause a paradigm shift in the way that medicines are designed and manufactured, moving away from a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach toward small-scale personalization. 3DP offers many opportunities to researchers by creating customized formulations that will be useful in clinical trials for testing new drugs, in the treatment of rare diseases (where the number of patients is low and costs are high), or in treatments where doses change frequently depending on therapeutic needs (e.g., narrow therapeutic index medicines). In the near future, we envision that hospitals and pharmacies will have 3D printers on-site, enabling healthcare professionals to print out tailor-made medicines on-demand. 

The use of 3DP for customized medical devices has been widely explored for many types, including hip replacements, prosthetics, and even in dentistry. We are confident that in the future these devices will also incorporate drugs, such as antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs, which will help with the healing process and increase the success rate of these implanted devices. These devices can be tailored for each individual in terms of size and shape using a 3D model obtained from imaging techniques, and they can also be personalized in terms of the drug and the dose that they incorporate.

Technology development

PharmTech:What are some of your current projects? 

Basit (UCL) and Goyanes (FabRx):We are identifying and formulating the most promising drugs for personalized medicine that could benefit from 3DP technology to be first on the market. At the same time, we are working to develop and adapt this technology for printing medicines, as well as integrate a quality control system in the printer, to enable both the production and real-time release of medicines at the dispensing point. We are also working in formulation development to ensure that the right formulations containing the right materials are produced, which can then be printed at the touch of a button. Furthermore, we are planning to conduct clinical trials and human studies to demonstrate that our technology is safe and fit-for-purpose.

Not all 3DP technologies are suitable for medicines. We are screening which ones are suitable, testing them by printing medicines, and trying to bring them to the market as soon as possible. We need to employ technologies that can be adapted to use pharmaceutical-grade excipients and medicines and that will be safe. We also need to be able to completely control the quality of the 3D-printed medicine.

We are focused on developing the world’s first pharmaceutical printer, because there are currently no printers adapted for these formulations. We are aiming to place the first printers within hospitals in two years, although we have started the first studies with patients in a hospital in June 2018. A critical factor centers around regulatory requirements; right now, it is not clear how the approval process will be constructed, if the printing process is going to be considered a manufacturing step (which has much higher control and regulation) or a compounding step (which is performed every day in hospitals with less strict regulation). As a company, we are scoping out which medicines could benefit the most from 3D printing and will demonstrate these formulations are safe within clinical trials, animal and human studies.  

PharmTech:What 3DP technologies are you considering for OSD drug manufacturing? 

Basit (UCL) and Goyanes (FabRx):We are evaluating a wide variety of 3DP technologies, in particular those that offer the best potential in developing better medicines, including selective laser sintering (SLS) and fused deposition modeling (FDM). Our novel FDM-type 3DP process involves a semisolid material being heated and extruded through a nozzle, which quickly solidifies on the build plate to create the designed printlet. 

We are very excited by the use of SLS 3DP; the process is very simple and enables the production of printlets just by using a laser to bind a drug-powder mixture. It is not necessary to get a filament by hot-melt extrusion as in FDM technology, and depending on the materials that we select, we can get very fast or targeted release of the drug in specific regions of the gastrointestinal tract. Although SLS is more expensive than FDM technology, the costs are going down due to the development of new desktop printers.

PharmTech: Can you describe your stereolithography (SLA) process for drug-loaded devices? What are the pros/cons of this compared to extrusion? 

Basit (UCL) and Goyanes (FabRx):In SLA, the starting material is a resin that gets solidified by the action of a laser or light. This technology is fast; incorporation of the drug within the solution is easy; and the resolution is really high. We think that SLA could be the best approach for the manufacture of medical devices, where the resolution of the object is important (such as with stents). The main drawback of this technology is the use of excipients that are not GRAS (generally recognized as safe) approved by FDA. A lot of research is currently underway to overcome this drawback, and it is only a matter of time before the market will see new resins and polymers approved for pharmaceuticals, in the same way that they are approved for dental applications. 

Reference

1.    American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, A. Basit and S. Gaisford, Eds., 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series 31 (Springer, 2018).