OR WAIT null SECS
More CMOs look to proprietary delivery technologies to enhance profitability.
Contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) are always looking for a competitive edge—something that can distinguish them from rivals and add incremental margin to their bottom lines. One of the tactics that CMOs are trying is to offer proprietary drug delivery technologies.
Drug delivery technologies are viewed by CMOs as offering several potential business advantages:
Examples of CMOs offering proprietary delivery technologies include Cardinal Health (Somerset, NJ, www.cardinal.com), which has its "Zydis" fast-dissolve, solid-dose technology and "DelPouch" and "Microsponge" topical delivery systems; Baxter Biopharma Solutions (Round Lake, IL, www.baxterbiopharmasolutions.com), whose portfolio includes the "Nanoedge" technology for drug solubilization and "Promaxx" microsphere technology; and Vetter (Ravensburg, Germany, www.vetter-pharma.com), which has a proprietary dual-chamber prefilled syringe for lyophilized injectable drugs.
Patheon and Depomed align
The latest CMO to add the drug delivery technology arrow to its quiver is Patheon, Inc. (Mississauga, ON, Canada, www.patheon.com). Patheon recently announced an alliance with Depomed, Inc. (Menlo Park, CA, www.depomedinc.com) to promote Depomed's "AcuForm" technology to its clients. AcuForm is a controlled-release tablet technology that delivers drugs to the stomach and upper segments of the small intestine. It incorporates proprietary excipients and formulation approaches, but can be manufactured on conventional tabletting equipment.
Depomed has two commercially approved products incorporating AcuForm: "ProQuin XR" tablets for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections and "Glumetza" for type 2 diabetes. A third product, "Gabapentin GR," is in Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Patheon is the current contract manufacturer for both approved products.
Under their agreement, Patheon will provide development and scale-up services for products incorporating the technology. Both companies will jointly review compounds before initiating work to avoid conflicts with Depomed's internal pipeline and to set development terms and license arrangements with third-party clients. Depomed and Patheon will share license fees, milestone payments, and royalties generated in deals involving the Depomed technology. The agreement further stipulates that any formulated products developed will be manufactured at a Patheon site.
The fact that Acuform is used in several marketed products removes a risk factor that Patheon has had experience with in the past. Some years back, Patheon announced an alliance with a UK company, Weston Medical Group, for a needle-free injection device, for which Patheon was to provide the manufacturing services. Patheon went so far as to build the filling line at its Swindon, UK facility. That technology has gone nowhere, because Weston ran into financial problems and the successor owner, Aradigm (Hayward, CA, www.aradigm.com~), made only limited progress with it. Aradigm recently sold the technology to a start-up company.
Delivery technology limitations. One of the drawbacks of the delivery technology strategy is that the limited applicability of any single technology restricts its potential to enhance a CMO's bottom line. The successful application of a drug delivery technology requires the confluence of multiple factors, including market factors such as competing therapies and reimbursement potential and technical factors such as compatibility of the API with the technology and pharmacokinetics of the drug when formulated. Very few candidates clear all the hurdles, so the CMO gets very few opportunities to cash in on its intellectual property.
One solution to that problem is to have your drug development advantage be in the form of broad expertise rather than a single technology. Cardinal Health, for instance, has developed considerable expertise in formulating products with controlled-release properties using widely available excipients and processing technologies such as Wurster column coating. This expertise can and has been used over a range of APIs and dosage forms.
With the contract manufacturing industry facing a new era of competition, CMOs will be developing various competencies aimed at differentiating themselves and gaining customer loyalty. Drug delivery expertise joins supply chain management, process optimization, and operating global networks as critical skill sets for the next generation of leading CMOs.
Mylan acquiring Matrix Laboratories
The acquisition of Matrix Laboratories (Hyderabad, India, www.matrixlabsindia.com) by Mylan Laboratories (Pittsburgh, PA, www.mylan.com)serves as a reminder to Western contract manufacturers that drug manufacturers in India and China, where cost is critical but intellectual property concerns are not, probably have more attractive opportunities in the generics sector than in contract manufacturing for branded products. It is also a reminder of how brutal competition at the retail end of the pharmaceutical value chain is becoming.
Matrix is a leading global supplier of generic APIs and has been a growing presence in the contract pharmaceutical chemical industry. Mylan is acquiring 51.5% of Matrix's outstanding shares from several large investors and will tender for another 20% of the shares. When the transactions are completed, Mylan will have controlling ownership of Matrix, but the company's remaining shares will continue to trade on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Mylan expects the total value of the transaction to be approximately $736 million.
Mylan is justifying its acquisition of Matrix on several grounds. For one, it expects to achieve cost and margin advantages by owning a manufacturer of generic APIs, especially one located in a low-cost country. Currently, it only has dose-manufacturing capabilities and buys APIs on the merchant market. Furthermore, Matrix affords Mylan with greater entry into the European market through its fully owned Belgian subsidiary, Docpharma, which it acquired in 2005 as well as to markets in Asia and Africa. In addition, Mylan was attracted by Matrix's portfolio of antiretroviral products, which accounted for nearly a quarter of Matrix's 2005 revenues.
It's not clear what the acquisition means for Matrix's contract development and manufacturing services business, which accounted for only 8% of Matrix's 2005 revenues ($20 million out of total revenues of $250 million). Matrix has significant manufacturing resources that Mylan could leverage for the contract business or devote to extending its franchise in generics. Matrix's manufacturing assets include six FDA-inspected API manufacturing facilities in India; a process technology company in Switzerland (Explora Laboratories) with expertise in biocatalysis and nucleic acid chemistry; a controlling ownership of Indian biomanufacturer Concord Biotech (Ahmedabad), which has fermentation capabilities; and a controlling interest in a Chinese manufacturer of chemical intermediates, MChem (Xiamen, China).
What is most striking about the deal is that although Mylan is the buyer, Matrix is clearly the more sophisticated global player. Matrix has built a sophisticated supply chain that sources early-stage intermediates in China, converts them to APIs in FDA-approved plants in India, formulates the APIs into finished dosage forms, and sells them in Asian and European markets. Mylan, by contrast, manufactures only drug product and operates largely in the United States. Matrix's global capabilities are likely to have much greater value to Mylan in the generics and branded generics markets than they are in contract manufacturing.
Jim Miller is president of PharmSource Information Services, Inc., and publisher of Bio/Pharmaceutical Outsourcing Report, tel. 703.383.4903, fax 703.383.4905, firstname.lastname@example.org.