
News|Videos|October 6, 2026
PharmTech AI Pulse Check: On-Prem vs. Cloud AI
Shadow AI and vendor data retention put GMP records and trade secrets at risk. AI Pulse Check panelists outline what pharma AI policies require.
Advertisement
Advertisement
When OpenAI has to publicly clarify that a user's Codex prompts could not have influenced its system, while admitting that de-identified usage data can still shape models generally, and Anthropic launches a life sciences verification program in the same news cycle, the gap between we don't train on your data and we don't keep your data becomes a quality problem for pharma,
Related to this article

Jaenisch, Muraru, and Pandey discuss new skills for QC and regulatory teams, plus patient trust, as new approach methodologies reshape pharma.

Panelists on PharmTech AI Pulse Check debate SURPASS, a new digital-twin trial program, regulatory acceptance, and the data-cleanup burden it will create.

Jaenisch, Muraru, and Pandey join PharmTech's Cole to discuss FDA's generative AI paper, ARPA-H's SURPASS trials, and AI accountability.

PharmTech AI Pulse Check panelists explain why attribution, audit trails, and sign-off matter more than AI watermark detection for GxP quality teams.

Cole and Jaenisch dig into AI poisoning in pharma manufacturing, how it hides in plain sight, and who should be accountable for catching it.

The deadline to comment on FDA's generative AI paper is Oct 19, 2026. We explain why professionals in pharma manufacturing should weigh in.

Stephanie Johnson, Pfizer, discusses how platform formulations moved 2 Pfizer protein programs to IND in 8 months by redistributing, not removing risk.
Advertisement
Advertisement

