
Acetaminophen and Autism: Industry Impacts of the White House Statement
Key Takeaways
- The Trump administration discourages acetaminophen use in pregnancy, citing potential links to autism and ADHD based on observational studies.
 - Key studies, such as the Nurses’ Health Study II and Boston Birth Cohort, suggest associations between acetaminophen exposure and neurological conditions in children.
 
The dispute shines a light on the vulnerability of long-established drugs to renewed safety scrutiny: Even when causal evidence is lacking, observational findings can influence policy and public perception.
On Sept. 22, 2025, the administration of US President Donald Trump took its most decisive steps yet in discouraging the ingestion of acetaminophen, most widely known under the brand name 
The same day, 
What sources is the White House citing?
In both the White House statement and the op-ed, the Trump administration links to information from several sources that it says have documented “observational evidence” of a connection between acetaminophen use, particularly close to delivery, and subsequent diagnoses of autism, ADHD, and other conditions.
The sources include peer-reviewed data from large-scale cohort studies, including the Nurses’ Health Study II and the Boston Birth Cohort.
Hasn’t Tylenol come under scrutiny in the past?
This is not the first public relations storm the Tylenol brand has had to weather—and it might not even be the biggest.
Almost exactly 43 years ago, in September 1982, seven people in the Chicago area died after ingesting doctored Tylenol capsules that had been laced with cyanide (5). Johnson & Johnson, the makers of Tylenol at the time—the brand was spun off under Kenvue Brands in 2021—was widely lauded for its comprehensive response, which included immediately recalling 31 million bottles and launching a public awareness campaign, in addition to a then-revolutionary decision that has become ubiquitous in the decades since: the introduction of tamper-evident packaging (5,6).
In this case, Kenvue’s response has been just as swift: A visit to the main page of Tylenol’s website on the morning of Sept. 23 prompts a pop-up window with a reassuring message to the public and a link to an FAQ page with more information (7,8).
“The facts remain unchanged: Over a decade of rigorous research, endorsed by leading medical professionals, confirm[s] there is no credible evidence linking acetaminophen to autism,” the pop-up says (7). “High fevers and pain are widely recognized as potential risks to a pregnancy if left untreated, especially in the first trimester. Remember to talk to your doctor.”
Which organizations’ advice does Tylenol recommend following?
The Tylenol FAQ page reiterates that “credible, independent scientific data continues to show no proven link between taking acetaminophen and autism,” and that “medical and public health organizations agree,” while continuing to advocate for communication between pregnant women and their healthcare professionals (8).
The page then links to statements from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Autism Science Foundation, all dated Sept. 5, 2025.
“Pregnant patients should not be frightened away from the many benefits of acetaminophen, which is safe and one of the few options pregnant people have for pain relief,” Christopher Zahn, MD, ACOG chief of clinical practice, was quoted as saying 
“At this time, the weight of scientific evidence that acetaminophen use during pregnancy causes an increased risk for autism or ADHD is simply inconclusive,” said SMFM President 
“It is disingenuous and misleading to boil autism’s causes down to one simple thing,” said 
What are the broader implications for industry?
The current dispute highlights the vulnerability of long-established drugs to renewed safety scrutiny. Even when causal evidence is lacking, observational findings can influence policy and public perception, forcing the industry to respond quickly to maintain confidence (1–4).
For manufacturers, the situation underscores the value of clear and rapid communication. Kenvue’s public messaging shows how companies must balance reassurance with openness to further study, particularly when regulatory bodies may revisit labeling or guidance (7,8).
On the research side, the debate may stimulate investment in mechanistic and biomarker studies that go beyond epidemiology. For discovery and development teams, it illustrates the need to anticipate potential safety questions earlier in the pipeline (3,4).
At the manufacturing level, even precautionary warnings could prompt companies to adjust supply strategies, labeling, or risk management plans. The Tylenol case demonstrates that legacy medicines can become focal points for political and scientific debate, demanding ongoing vigilance from the industry (9–11).
References
1. The White House. 
2. Bhattacharya, J.; Makary, M.; and Oz, M. 
3. Liew, Z.; Kioumourtzoglou, M.-A.; Roberts, A. L.; et al. Use of Negative Control Exposure Analysis to Evaluate Confounding: An Example of Acetaminophen Exposure and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Nurses’ Health Study II. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 188 (4) 768–775. DOI: 
4. Ji, Y.; Azuine, R. E.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Association of Cord Plasma Biomarkers of In Utero Acetaminophen Exposure With Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Childhood. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 77 (2) 180–189. DOI: 
5. Hamel-Nelis, M. 
6. Chapman, M. and Murphy, T. 
7. Kenvue Brands. 
8. Kenvue Brands. 
9. ACOG. 
10. SMFM. 
11. Autism Science Foundation. 
Newsletter
Get the essential updates shaping the future of pharma manufacturing and compliance—subscribe today to Pharmaceutical Technology and never miss a breakthrough.





