News|Videos|July 24, 2025

Ask the Expert: Identity Testing on a Final Product

In this episode of the Ask the Expert video series, Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow at Regulatory Compliance Associates, and Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical at Parexel, discuss if and when identity testing is necessary to be performed on a final product when the API is sourced from a third party.

In this episode of the Ask the Expert video series, Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow at Regulatory Compliance Associates, and Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical at Parexel, discuss if and when identity testing is necessary to be performed on a final product when the API is sourced from a third party.

“It's an interesting question, because you're going to get the API with a certificate of analysis, and you're going to do the identity and testing on that,” Schniepp ponders. “So I understand that they're trying to get out of redundant testing, and maybe there's a different way to approach it, but at some point in the final product testing, you're going to have to come up with what is the potency of that active ingredient in your final product, which you know you're identifying it. So, I don't know if you can say, ‘my potency test counts as my identity test, and it gives me the exact amount that's in my final product’. Bit, it's usually a fairly simple test. So, I'm not sure what the benefit you gain [from not doing the test]. You're going to spend more time justifying why you're not doing an identity test than the benefit gained from, you know, just doing it.”

Click the video above to watch Sue and Siegfried answer the following question:

“My company sources our API from a third party. Do we have to conduct identity testing on the final product before distribution?”

Test your knowledge

About the experts

Susan J. Schniepp is distinguished fellow at Regulatory Compliance Associates and a member of Pharmaceutical Technology®'s Editorial Advisory Board.

Siegfried Schmitt is vice president, Technical at Parexel and a member of Pharmaceutical Technology®'s Editorial Advisory Board.

Ask the Expert Video Series

Welcome to the Ask the Expert video series. This series is an extension of the PharmTech Group’s long-running print column in which industry experts answer common quality and regulatory questions from the industry. This new video series will expand on topic areas to include development and manufacturing concerns to help those working in the industry better understand bio/pharmaceutical requirements. Have a question you would like answered? Send it to PTProjects@mmhgroup.com, and it may appear in a future episode or print column.

We hope you enjoy the discussion!


Related to this article

Glass vial, pipette and woman scientist in laboratory for medical study, research or experiment. Test tube, dropper and professional female person with chemical liquid for pharmaceutical innovation. | Image Credit: ©HockleyMedia24/peopleimages.com -stock.adobe.com
Equivalence test using two one-sided tests are widely used for demonstrating the comparability of treatment effects in different research fields. The method described in the manuscript aims to use simulations in Microsoft Excel to compute power for 2 one-sided tests for two groups with unequal variances.
Complying with International Pharmacopoeias
Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow with Nelson Labs, and Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical, with Parexel, clear up some of the confusion about what does and does not need to be complied with regarding standards set by international pharmacopoeias.
PharmTech Weekly Roundup—October 2, 2026
This week on PharmTech, Merck diversified its pipeline, USP emphasizes supply chain security, AI systems are examined, and speakers preview their presentations at CPHI Milan and AAPS PharmSci 360.
CPHI Milan 2026: Nitrosamine Risk Mitigation, Part 1
Capsugel's Bram Baert and Sandrine Picco argue that chasing zero nitrite in pharmaceutical excipients is often impractical and costly. They recommend setting scientifically justified, risk-based limits and consistently staying below them.
Regulatory Roundup—September 2026
The FDA opened an expedited IND pilot, tightened scrutiny of foreign trial data, and finalized a rule recognizing non-animal testing methods. In Europe, the EMA advanced pharmaceutical legislation reform, restricted 2 legacy products, and opened an injectable-iron safety review.