News|Articles|December 12, 2018

In the Lab eNewsletter

  • Pharmaceutical Technology\'s In the Lab eNewsletter-01-09-2019
  • Volume 14
  • Issue 1

FDA Answers Data Integrity Questions

New FDA guidance developed to identify lapses in data integrity and promote best practices.

With data integrity identified as a primary focus of its enforcement actions, FDA issued a new guidance document on Dec. 12, 2018, to provide definitions and the agency’s current thinking on best practices. The guidance, Data Integrity and Compliance with Drug cGMP: Questions and Answers, outlines the design, operation, and monitoring of data integrity systems.

In a statement accompanying the release of the document, the agency noted that the revised recommendations were developed to help manufacturers address “identified data integrity lapses, implement best practices to address gaps that can create risks to data integrity, and ensure consistent awareness and commitment to ensuring data integrity.”

In addition to definitions of system components, the guidance answers common questions including the following:

  • When is it permissible to invalidate a cGMP result and exclude it from the determination of batch conformance?

  • How should access to cGMP computer systems be restricted?

  • Who should review audit trails?

  • Can electronic signatures be used instead of handwritten signatures for master production and control records?

“We continue to observe cGMP violations involving data integrity, which underscore the need to provide industry with guidance and address observed problems. When we see these violations, we take appropriate enforcement actions against manufacturers,” wrote Gottlieb in the statement. “We also expect all manufacturers to conduct timely and appropriate investigations of suspected problems, including expanding the scope beyond the narrow problem first observed into any other potentially impacted data, batches, or products. Pharmaceutical quality can only be assured by robust quality control, which includes vigilant oversight of data integrity.”

Sources: FDA Guidance and FDA Statement

 


Related to this article

Glass vial, pipette and woman scientist in laboratory for medical study, research or experiment. Test tube, dropper and professional female person with chemical liquid for pharmaceutical innovation. | Image Credit: ©HockleyMedia24/peopleimages.com -stock.adobe.com
Equivalence test using two one-sided tests are widely used for demonstrating the comparability of treatment effects in different research fields. The method described in the manuscript aims to use simulations in Microsoft Excel to compute power for 2 one-sided tests for two groups with unequal variances.
Complying with International Pharmacopoeias
Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow with Nelson Labs, and Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical, with Parexel, clear up some of the confusion about what does and does not need to be complied with regarding standards set by international pharmacopoeias.
CPHI Milan 2026: Nitrosamine Risk Mitigation, Part 2
Mitigating nitrosamine risk requires assessing each product individually, says Bram Baert, Global Head of Regulatory Affairs at Capsugel, and Sandrine Picco, Senior Analytical Specialist on Capsugel's Innovaform Accelerator Team, in this interview with PharmTech.